Search found 6 matches

by cacollin
Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:21 am
Forum: Installation
Topic: Any guidance on when we will see 3.0?
Replies: 13
Views: 7456

Re: Any guidance on when we will see 3.0?

My Internet connection is slow, so each file takes roughly 2.5 hours to download. Plus, I can't connect via the internet from the machines I actually do my work on, which means I then have to transfer the downloaded files to the actual machine I work on -- so double the transfer time. If I could ret...
by cacollin
Tue Jul 12, 2011 1:14 pm
Forum: Installation
Topic: Any guidance on when we will see 3.0?
Replies: 13
Views: 7456

Re: Any guidance on when we will see 3.0?

How about a means of obtaining ADL 3.0 via ftp? That would be helpful.
by cacollin
Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:40 am
Forum: Installation
Topic: Mx4 and ADL 2.0?
Replies: 0
Views: 1844

Mx4 and ADL 2.0?

Is the ADL package that was included with the MX4 code (IDPS v1.5.04.00) supposed to be ADL 2.0? The ADL files under Mx4 show ADL 1.1, is that what I should have expected?
by cacollin
Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:56 am
Forum: VIIRS SDR
Topic: bitfields concern
Replies: 3
Views: 22517

Re: bitfields concern

Perhaps a regular DR should be written against the IDPS code on this? I've emailed Neal Baker to get feedback since he's managing a lot of the DRs.
by cacollin
Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:03 am
Forum: VIIRS SDR
Topic: bitfields concern
Replies: 3
Views: 22517

bitfields concern

It seems that we should move away from using bitfields if we are trying to have the code be platform independent. We (Land PEATE) found some arguments to support this when researching bitfield usage online: "In general you should avoid bitfields and instead use explicit bit masking and shifting...
by cacollin
Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:35 am
Forum: Installation
Topic: What will ADL 3.0 have?
Replies: 1
Views: 1920

What will ADL 3.0 have?

Does anyone know if ADL 3.0 that will accompany v1.5.5 of the IDPS code will have all of the algorithms integrated to work with it instead of just a subset?