Search found 23 matches
- Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:08 am
- Forum: VIIRS SDR
- Topic: missing VIIRS-RSBAUTOCAL-OBCIP-HISTORY-AUX
- Replies: 20
- Views: 57023
Re: missing VIIRS-RSBAUTOCAL-OBCIP-HISTORY-AUX
The VIIRS-RSBAUTOCAL-OBCIP-HISTORY-AUX is supposed to be an optional input for ProSdrViirsRSBAutoCal. Look in the config guide, $ADL_HOME/cfg/<spacecraft>/ProSdrViirsRSBAutoCal_CFG.xml, where <spacecraft> is NPP or J01 depending on what data you are trying to process. In the Inputs group, there shou...
- Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:54 pm
- Forum: VIIRS SDR
- Topic: J1 test data: CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23250
Re: J1 test data: CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT error
I did a quick check and for VIIRS, the LUTs looked like they were mostly the same in Mx8.8 and the ADL 5.0 beta package. I didn't look at the other sensors. I think ADL 5.0 was based on Mx8.6, so I wouldn't expect many differences between it and the Mx8.8 version.
- Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:27 pm
- Forum: VIIRS EDRs
- Topic: Bypassing an Optional Input
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22780
Re: Bypassing an Optional Input
Just wanted to correct my last post ... I should have said to run 'make clean library program' not 'make clean library'.
- Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:20 am
- Forum: VIIRS EDRs
- Topic: Bypassing an Optional Input
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22780
Re: Bypassing an Optional Input
There are three files you would need to change to make AOT IP an input. You might have done some of them already, but I'll just mention them here on the forum. 1. Make the AOT IP an input by adding it to the config guide, ProEdrViirsVI_CFG.xml. In the input group, add these lines as a new 'group' el...
- Thu May 21, 2015 11:42 am
- Forum: VIIRS SDR
- Topic: J1 test data: CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23250
Re: J1 test data: CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT error
I think you are using the correct LUT, but with the wrong metadata. The message says that DMS is looking for a CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT with Platform_Short_Name equal to J01, but the CMNGEO-PARAM-LUT we distribute with ADL has Platform_Short_Name=NPP. (At least that's how it is for ADL 4.2.) You could try c...
- Fri May 15, 2015 3:46 pm
- Forum: Input and Output
- Topic: pack RCRIS and RNSCA together using ADL_Packer.exe
- Replies: 3
- Views: 24129
Re: pack RCRIS and RNSCA together using ADL_Packer.exe
It looks like you're getting the same error that 'xjin' reported two years ago in ADL 4.1. The RDR packaging capability has not been added to ADL 4.2, so Bryan Henderson's comment is still applicable.
- Wed May 13, 2015 8:04 am
- Forum: Runtime
- Topic: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 47323
Re: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
From your earlier message, it looks like you were having a segmentation fault because DCONFIG was not defined in your environment. Line 163 of ADL_Main.cpp would cause a segmentation fault because the getenv function returns a null pointer in this case. After that, you say you ran the command "...
- Fri May 01, 2015 8:08 am
- Forum: Runtime
- Topic: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 47323
Re: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
Thanks for the information Scott. The current ADL user guide lists 1.8.6 as the official version of the HDF software, and it lists 1.8.7 as a compatible version. The ADL environment I use has HDF version 1.8.6 and I don't remember ever seeing a core dump from the ADL Unpacker.
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:15 am
- Forum: Runtime
- Topic: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
- Replies: 15
- Views: 47323
Re: ADL_Unpacke segmentation fault (core dumped)
I have not seen a segmentation fault with the ADL Unpacker so far. I have a couple of questions that could help me look into this problem: - Can you give any details on the core dump? You should have the gdb debugger on your system. Run the command: gdb $ADL_HOME/tools/bin/ADL_Unpacker.exe <corefile...
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 4:10 pm
- Forum: VIIRS EDRs
- Topic: Change Granule Metadata in the VI EDR Product
- Replies: 7
- Views: 30174
Re: Change Granule Metadata in the VI EDR Product
I think the N_Quality_Summary_Names list is being ordered alphabetically. Before your code changes, 'No Land in Granule' was last in alphabetical order, but after your changes, it is first. As long as each name has the correct value in the N_Quality_Summary_Values list, I don't think this is a probl...